thirteen Sociodemographic facts have been checked-out having detailed objectives as well as for the potential confounding outcomes due to the fact hypothesized based on the literature. Especially, we examined many years, relationship reputation and you may years to start with marriage, parity, rural-versus-metropolitan neighborhood off home within ages a dozen, instructional attainment, and you can newest a job. g., part of illiterate individuals over 15 years of age, portion of those with no drainage solution) (CONAPO). Higher marginalization membership indicate higher poverty.
Data
14 To look at if the idea off wellness selectivity pertains to reproductive health risks one of Mexican feminine, i opposed sexual habits and you will contraceptive means ranging from five categories of women: Mexican women and no reputation for You.S. migration for the 2002 who failed to migrate on United states regarding the after that 3 years; Mexican female and no reputation for U.S. migration when you look at the 2002 whom performed migrate on All of us to have a minimum lifetime of 12 months ranging from 2002 and 2005 (or exactly who lived truth be told there for the 2005 and you may was indeed anticipated to live in the usa for around one year); Mexican immigrant women staying in the united states inside the 2002; and you may U.S.-created feminine from Mexican lineage remaining in the usa inside 2002. An assessment off reproductive wellness selectivity would-be undertaken only using the first a few teams (MxFLS study merely); not, for the evaluating the fresh new reproductive wellness character ahead of migration with this certainly North american country immigrants remaining in the united states (NSFG decide to try), we are able to read the how similar this You.S.-built international-produced people would be to those individuals feminine sampled inside the Mexico just who migrate after that. Regardless if an out in-depth examination may be out of the focus of the studies, such as for instance an assessment can offer evidence towards training to which this new Latino Paradox can be on account of wellness possibilities (we.age., lower-exposure female migrate) rather than structural and cultural assimilation techniques.
15 First we examined detailed statistics one to characterized the fresh sociodemographic history regarding survey respondents. We looked at having differences in sociodemographic records within the two Mexico and you can You.S. samples having fun with contingency table analysis and you will, getting continuous steps, tested the latest null theory that two function was basically equivalent having fun with the fresh new adjusted Wald attempt. I analyzed differences in birth-control have fun with and you will sexual behaviors by calculating the new dimensions of people revealing each choices one of feamales in for every of your five organizations as well as 95% confidence intervals. For continuing otherwise number methods, i determined form having 95% rely on times. Estimates is comparable myself along the four groups of female, which have low-overlapping confidence intervals indicating statistically more estimates.
sixteen I utilized multivariable logistic and you can Poisson regression to modify for hidden society variations in years build and you can socioeconomic status. Separate models have been developed for every reproductive health behavior, that have head contrasting inside the Mexico and U.S. datasets.
17 For all analyses we put appropriate sampling weights and you will specified the fresh questionnaire framework (pripling units and you may strata) to make certain that rates and you can standard errors is similar to the questionnaire design gdje mogu ići u susret bucmast samohranim ženama . I conducted analyses using Stata mathematical app version ten.
Sociodemographic Background
18 Among female MxFLS respondents aged 15-49 years with no prior U.S. migration experience in 2002, 2.5% (N = 214) migrated to the United States during the subsequent three years (between survey waves 1 and 2). Women who migrated to the United States were more likely to have expressed intentions to migrate at wave 1 (3.2% who reported intending to migrate versus 1.9% who reported no migration intentions actually migrated, p = 0.02) and to report having relatives in the United States (79.0% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.0001).>
Desk 1A. Sociodemographic Features out of North american country Feminine with no U.S. Migration Sense Stratified by Then You.S. Migration: Mexico Family unit members Life Questionnaire, 2002
