Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and you will Individual Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area off attachment from inside the peoples mating. Report on General Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An effective. (2002). Sites paradox reviewed. Diary regarding Personal Situations, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet sites contradiction: A personal technical that decreases personal engagement and you will emotional really-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Meters., & Areas, J. Meters. (2001). Matter, timing, and you will duration of marriages and you will divorces. Latest People Profile, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study away from closeness, appeal, and you can commitment: Review the brand new assumptions of one’s triangular theory from like. Mental Accounts, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step three.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Perception ideal regarding the undertaking bad: Social contrasting in this personal dating. Record out of Character and you will Personal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: Brand new implicit knowledge from personal rivalry. Journal off Identity and you may Personal Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.
A beneficial. (2001)mitment and you can relationships repair components
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention in order to glamorous selection: The fresh advanced mindset out-of relationship fix. Development and Human Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential study from argument and you can accord for the disturb and you can nondistressed marital partners. Journal of Asking and you can Medical Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A good., Environmentally friendly, A beneficial. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationships creation online: What is the huge appeal? Journal regarding Societal Situations, 58(1), 9–31.
The many benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization and also the design of satisfaction during the personal relationship
Neff, L. An effective., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-review aim within the close relationships: A style of worldwide improvement and you will specific verification. In the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), meget varm Italiensk pige Wisdom ents on the examination of partners telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College or university Press.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the consumer-specialist bond through the contact off connection principle. Psychotherapy: Idea, Look, Habit, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The public monitoring system: Increased sensitivity in order to social cues since a transformative reaction to personal exception. During the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh new personal outcast: Ostracism, personal difference, rejection, and you can bullying (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Therapy Force.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Around the world and you may particular relational models regarding contact with societal connections. Diary regarding Identification and you will Societal Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you can recommendations seeking to in close relationship. Identity and Social Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you may specific connection representations into the adulthood: Can there be a relationship?. Diary Of Personal And personal Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Inside J. Harvey & A good. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal close relationship: Restoration and you may enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A great. D. (2000). Projection actually perception certainly one of partners once the a function of the latest similarity inside their shared knowledge. Identification And you can Societal Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience away from extrinsic perks to your liking and you may loving. Record out of Identification and you will Societal Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.
